These are the biggest losers for 2009
There’s bad news and good news coming out of the housing market. Forbes Magazine released study results by Local Market Monitor that showed the cities that lost the most value are concentrated in some areas of California, Florida, Nevada, and the Northeast.These cities were impacted by local and national factors such as increased unemployment and the rising cost of housing which resulted in homebuyers gambling on the odds of whether they could afford long-term housing
West Coast housing markets fared the worst, losing the most value—21.6 percent since their peak. Florida housing lost 31 percent, the Northeast lost an average of 8.6 percent, and the Midwest lost, on average, 5.6 percent. The top five cities to lose value in the West (most in California): in California--Merced, (-62.11 percent), Stockton (-54.29), Modesto (-52.42), Vallejo-Fairfield (-47.62), and in Nevada—Las Vegas-Paradise (-47.53) In the South, the top five cities to lose the most value are located in Florida: Port St. Lucie (-46.43), Cape Coral-Fort-Myers (-46.38), Naples-Marco Island (-43.63), Bradenton-Sarasota-Venice (-41.52), and Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach (-39.93).
In the Northeast, the top five cities to lose value are: Providence-New Bedford, R.I. (-17.30), Worcester, Mass. (-16.17), Atlantic City, N.J. (-16.15), Poughkeepsie-Newburgh, N.Y. (-14.60), and Barnstable Town, Mass. (-14.48).
Moving to the Midwest, the top five cities to lose value are in Michigan: Detroit-Livonia (-30.66), Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills (-27.95), Flint (-27.47), Ann Arbor (-20.37), and Jackson (-17.30). Source: Forbes, Francesca, Levy (12/21/2009).
Michael Pittman
Keller Williams Sonoran Living
Realtor®
602-622-2776 Main
602-258-7035 Home
